To Be Loved or Feared as a Leader? Essay - 1710 Words.
One cannot help but notice that Machiavelli throughout The Prince is biased toward crushing rather than kindness. He makes this point a number of ways such as “since love and fear can hardly exist together, if we must choose between them, it is far safer to be feared than loved” (Machiavelli, p. 51).
Niccolo Machiavelli was born into a time of political upheaval in Italy. At the time of his birth to a wealthy Florentine lawyer in 1469, the Medici family had been ruling Italy for 35 years. The political life in Italy was characterized by instability, fear, and invasion as the small states of I.
Niccolo Machiavelli was a fifteenth century philosopher whose chief belief was that a good leader must be feared by his people. Machiavelli’s theory on leading is by far the most effectual. as portrayed through “Lord of the Flies” .One of the chief points that Machiavelli made on leading was that “It is safer to be feared than to be loved” ( Machiavelli. 6 ).
When it came to being loved, or feared, Niccolo Machiavelli was all about being feared. The devotion of love will always fail, but the chain of fear is never broken. Push fear to the edge of hatred, but are the necessity of a prince. Niccolo Machiavelli said “Being disarmed makes you despised”, so at all times, practice both mind and body.
One of the main points that Machiavelli made on leadership was that “It is safer to be feared than to be loved” (Machiavelli, 6). When a leader is feared he may be certain that his followers will submit to him, while if a leader is loved his subjects may turn against him with no consequence.
As Opposed to being Loved, it is safer to be Feared in a Manner that Avoids Hatred There are times when being feared may mean a more firm grip on power for a prince. Machiavelli reasons that it is possible for a prince to be feared and not hated at the same time by showing cruelty only when there is “proper justification and manifest cause”.
According to Machiavelli, it is better for a ruler to be feared than to be loved. This is the case, he says, because a ruler who is feared is less likely to be overthrown. In other words.